Jolly Roger wrote on 31.07.2021 19:58
> If you knew anything about AirDrop you would know that's not something
> anyone does by accident.
The question really is _why_ are apologists so desperate to defend Apple?
Unlike the apologists who often don't even click on the links before
brazenly denying any facts in them about Apple must always be wrong...
I clicked on the link (dated 7/23/2021) which Steve had provided.
*Plane Evacuated, Searched After Teen Airdrops Photo*
*of Airsoft Gun to Other Passengers*
<
https://www.newsweek.com/plane-evacuated-searched-after-teen-airdrops-photo-airsoft-gun-other-passengers-1612667gun-other-passengers-1612667>
Given the cultist apologists didn't even _read_ the cite before desperately
trying to absolve Apple of all possible faults, this is the 1st sentence:
"A plane at the San Francisco International Airport was cleared of its
passengers and searched Thursday after *some of the passengers said*
they received an unsolicited photo of an airsoft gun."
Fact:
a. The plane at SFO was evacuated.
b. Passengers said they received an unsolicited photo of an airsoft gun.
c. Beale (a radio host) said a teen sent them through AirDrop.
Fact:
a. What Steve said was "Just be careful who[m] you Airdop to..."
b. Beale said the "the flight was held on the tarmac due to... a prank."
c. The Airport Commission confirmed the details Beale provided.
Notice how the apologists desperately _reacted_ to all these simple facts.
(Without actually ever even _reading_ the article that Steve cited!)
What Steve said seems to be perfectly correct, even as the apologists, as
always being _desperate_ to absolve Apple of all possible faults, went off
on the tangent (by way of excusing Apple) that it was no accident.
Fact:
a. Steve never said it was an accident (he only said to be careful).
b. The inappropriate photo _was_ sent by Airdrop.
c. The teen wasn't careful enough about who[m] he Airdrop'd to.
Seems to me, an adult who actually clicked on the link Steve provided,
that what Steve said was completely in tune with what the cite claimed.
The question really is _why_ are apologists so desperate to defend Apple?
--
Alan Baker, Bob Campbell, Chris, Haemactylus, Joerg Lorenz, Jolly Roger,
Lewis, nospam, Rod Speed, Savageduck, Wade Garrett, Wolffan, Your Name,
et al., are so shallow that they can't even click on the links in cites!